کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5642220 1406880 2017 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Quantitative assessment of prevalence of pre-analytical variables and their effect on coagulation assay. Can intervention improve patient safety?
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ارزیابی کمی از شیوع متغیرهای پیشآزمون و تأثیر آن بر روی آزمون انعقاد آیا مداخله ایمنی بیمار را بهبود می دهد؟
کلمات کلیدی
متغیرهای پیشآمدی، تست انعقاد، مداخله، مطالعه هند،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی دندانپزشکی، جراحی دهان و پزشکی
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundVery few Indian studies exist on evaluation of pre-analytical variables affecting “Prothrombin Time” the commonest coagulation assay performed. The study was performed in an Indian tertiary care setting with an aim to assess quantitatively the prevalence of pre-analytical variables and their effects on the results (patient safety), for Prothrombin time test. The study also evaluated their effects on the result and whether intervention, did correct the results.MethodsThe firstly evaluated the prevalence for various pre-analytical variables detected in samples sent for Prothrombin Time testing. These samples with the detected variables wherever possible were tested and result noted. The samples from the same patients were repeated and retested ensuring that no pre-analytical variable is present. The results were again noted to check for difference the intervention produced.ResultsThe study evaluated 9989 samples received for PT/INR over a period of 18 months. The prevalence of different pre-analytical variables was found to be 862 (8.63%). The proportion of various pre-analytical variables detected were haemolysed samples 515 (5.16%), over filled vacutainers 62 (0.62%), under filled vacutainers 39 (0.39%), low values 205 (2.05%), clotted samples 11 (0.11%), wrong labeling 4 (0.04%), wrong vacutainer use 2 (0.02%), chylous samples 7 (0.07%) and samples with more than one variable 17 (0.17%). The comparison of percentage of samples showing errors were noted for the first variables since they could be tested with and without the variable in place. The reduction in error percentage was 91.5%, 69.2%, 81.5% and 95.4% post intervention for haemolysed, overfilled, under filled and samples collected with excess pressure at phlebotomy respectively.ConclusionCorrecting the variables did reduce the error percentage to a great extent in these four variables and hence the variables are found to affect “Prothrombin Time” testing and can hamper patient safety.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Medical Journal Armed Forces India - Volume 73, Issue 2, April 2017, Pages 152-158
نویسندگان
, ,