کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5689999 | 1410011 | 2017 | 13 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of elagolix vs. placebo and elagolix with low-dose E2/progestogen add-back therapy.DesignProof-of-concept, dose-ranging, multiple-cohort study.SettingClinics.Patient(s)Premenopausal women with fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding (menstrual blood loss [MBL] >80Â mL per cycle).Intervention(s)Three months' treatment with elagolix alone: 100Â mg twice daily (BID), 200Â mg BID, 300Â mg BID, 400Â mg once daily (QD), or 600Â mg QD (all but the 600Â mg QD arm were placebo controlled); or elagolix plus add-back therapy: 200Â mg BID plus continuous low-dose E2 0.5Â mg/norethindrone acetate 0.1Â mg or elagolix 300Â mg BID plus E2 1Â mg continuously and cyclical P 200Â mg.Main Outcome Measure(s)Least-squares mean percentage change in MBL; adverse events (AEs).Result(s)Mean age was 41.8Â years; 73.8% were black; mean baseline MBL was 267Â mL. Of randomized women (elagolix alone, n = 160; placebo, n = 50; elagolix with add-back therapy, n = 61), 228 of 271 completed the 3-month treatment period. The MBL percentage change from baseline to last 28Â days was significantly greater with elagolix alone (range, â72% to â98%; dose-dependent reduction was highest with 300Â mg BID) vs. placebo (range, â8% to â41%); mean percentage changes with add-back regimens were â80% to â85%. Overall AEs were dose independent (elagolix alone, 70.0%-81.3%) but lower with placebo (56.0%) and add-back regimens (55.6%-70.6%). Hot flush was the most common AE (elagolix alone, 45.5%-62.5%; placebo, 12.0%; add-back regimens, 18.5%-26.5%).Conclusion(s)Elagolix significantly reduced heavy menstrual bleeding in women with fibroids. Low-dose add-back regimens substantially reduced flushing.Clinical Trial Registration NumberNCT01441635.
Journal: Fertility and Sterility - Volume 108, Issue 1, July 2017, Pages 152-160.e4