کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5694976 1410205 2017 14 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Individualized versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی زنان، زایمان و بهداشت زنان
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Individualized versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of follitropin delta, a new human recombinant FSH with individualized dosing based on serum antimüllerian hormone (AMH) and body weight, with conventional follitropin alfa dosing for ovarian stimulation in women undergoing IVF.DesignRandomized, multicenter, assessor-blinded, noninferiority trial (ESTHER-1).SettingReproductive medicine clinics.Patient(s)A total of 1,329 women (aged 18-40 years).Intervention(s)Follitropin delta (AMH <15 pmol/L: 12 μg/d; AMH ≥15 pmol/L: 0.10-0.19 μg/kg/d; maximum 12 μg/d), or follitropin alfa (150 IU/d for 5 days, potential subsequent dose adjustments; maximum 450 IU/d).Main Outcomes Measure(s)Ongoing pregnancy and ongoing implantation rates; noninferiority margins −8.0%.Result(s)Ongoing pregnancy (30.7% vs. 31.6%; difference −0.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) −5.9% to 4.1%]), ongoing implantation (35.2% vs. 35.8%; −0.6% [95% CI −6.1% to 4.8%]), and live birth (29.8% vs. 30.7%; −0.9% [95% CI −5.8% to 4.0%]) rates were similar for individualized follitropin delta and conventional follitropin alfa. Individualized follitropin delta resulted in more women with target response (8-14 oocytes) (43.3% vs. 38.4%), fewer poor responses (fewer than four oocytes in patients with AMH <15 pmol/L) (11.8% vs. 17.9%), fewer excessive responses (≥15 or ≥20 oocytes in patients with AMH ≥15 pmol/L) (27.9% vs. 35.1% and 10.1% vs. 15.6%, respectively), and fewer measures taken to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (2.3% vs. 4.5%), despite similar oocyte yield (10.0 ± 5.6 vs. 10.4 ± 6.5) and similar blastocyst numbers (3.3 ± 2.8 vs. 3.5 ± 3.2), and less gonadotropin use (90.0 ± 25.3 vs. 103.7 ± 33.6 μg).Conclusion(s)Optimizing ovarian response in IVF by individualized dosing according to pretreatment patient characteristics results in similar efficacy and improved safety compared with conventional ovarian stimulation.Clinical Trial Registration NumberNCT01956110.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Fertility and Sterility - Volume 107, Issue 2, February 2017, Pages 387-396.e4
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , ,