کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
572523 | 1452943 | 2013 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Bayesian-network-based safety risk assessment for steel construction projects Bayesian-network-based safety risk assessment for steel construction projects](/preview/png/572523.png)
There are four primary accident types at steel building construction (SC) projects: falls (tumbles), object falls, object collapse, and electrocution. Several systematic safety risk assessment approaches, such as fault tree analysis (FTA) and failure mode and effect criticality analysis (FMECA), have been used to evaluate safety risks at SC projects. However, these traditional methods ineffectively address dependencies among safety factors at various levels that fail to provide early warnings to prevent occupational accidents. To overcome the limitations of traditional approaches, this study addresses the development of a safety risk-assessment model for SC projects by establishing the Bayesian networks (BN) based on fault tree (FT) transformation. The BN-based safety risk-assessment model was validated against the safety inspection records of six SC building projects and nine projects in which site accidents occurred. The ranks of posterior probabilities from the BN model were highly consistent with the accidents that occurred at each project site. The model accurately provides site safety-management abilities by calculating the probabilities of safety risks and further analyzing the causes of accidents based on their relationships in BNs. In practice, based on the analysis of accident risks and significant safety factors, proper preventive safety management strategies can be established to reduce the occurrence of accidents on SC sites.
► Assess steel construction safety risk by Bayesian networks based on fault tree.
► Four real projects in which a specific site accident occurred were validated.
► Ranks of posterior probabilities are consistent with the actual accident occurred.
Journal: Accident Analysis & Prevention - Volume 54, May 2013, Pages 122–133