کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
572999 877387 2011 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Understanding whiplash injury and prevention mechanisms using a human model of the neck
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی شیمی بهداشت و امنیت شیمی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Understanding whiplash injury and prevention mechanisms using a human model of the neck
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectivesVarious models for rear crash simulation exist and each has unique advantages and limitations. Our goals were to: determine the neck load and motion responses of a human model of the neck (HUMON) during simulated rear crashes; evaluate HUMON's biofidelity via comparisons with in vivo data; and investigate mechanisms of whiplash injury and prevention.MethodsHUMON, consisting of a neck specimen (n = 6) mounted to the torso of BioRID II and carrying a surrogate head and stabilized with muscle force replication, was subjected to simulated rear crashes in an energy-absorbing seat with fixed head restraint (HR) at peak sled accelerations of 9.9 g (ΔV 9.2 kph), 12.0 g (ΔV 11.4 kph), and 13.3 g (ΔV 13.4 kph). Physiologic spinal rotation ranges were determined from intact flexibility tests. Average time–history response corridors (±1 standard deviation) were computed for spinal motions, loads, and injury criteria.ResultsNeck loads generally increased caudally and consisted of shear, compression, and flexion moment caused by straightening of the kyphotic thoracic and lordotic lumbar curvatures, upward torso ramping, and head inertial and head/HR contact loads. Nonphysiologic rotation occurred in flexion at C7/T1 prior to head/HR contact and in extension at C6/7 and C7/T1 during head/HR contact.ConclusionsHUMON's neck load and motion responses compared favorably with in vivo data. Lower cervical spine flexion–compression injuries prior to head/HR contact and extension–compression injuries during head/HR contact may be reduced by refinement of existing seatback, lapbelt, and HR designs and/or development of new injury prevention systems.

Research highlights
► HUMON's neck load and motion responses compared favorably with in vivo data.
► Neck loads consisted of shear, compression, and flexion moment.
► Injurious lower cervical spine motion occurred prior to and during head/HR contact.
► Injuries may be reduced by refinement of injury prevention systems.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Accident Analysis & Prevention - Volume 43, Issue 4, July 2011, Pages 1392–1399
نویسندگان
, ,