کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5920373 1164287 2012 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Pitfalls in comparisons of genetic distances: A case study of the avian family Acrocephalidae
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک بوم شناسی، تکامل، رفتار و سامانه شناسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Pitfalls in comparisons of genetic distances: A case study of the avian family Acrocephalidae
چکیده انگلیسی

Genetic distances are increasingly being used for identification and species delimitation, especially since the introduction of “barcoding”. While for phylogenetic inferences great care is generally taken to choose the best-fit evolutionary model, this is usually neglected in calculating genetic distances. Moreover, distances obtained from others than best-fit models, different lengths of sequences, and even different loci are often freely compared. We examined the influence of different methods on calculating genetic distances using mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences for the passerine family Acrocephalidae.We found substantial differences between: (1) corrected distances based on the best-fit model (TrN + Γ) vs. uncorrected p-distances; (2) distances calculated based on different parts of the same gene; and (3) distances calculated using the methods of “complete deletion” vs. “pairwise deletion” for sequences that included uncertain nucleotides. All these methodological differences affected comparisons between species and potential taxonomical conclusions.We suggest that (1) different loci are incomparable. (2) Only perfectly homologous regions (same length, same part of locus) should be compared. (3) In the case of sequences with some uncertain nucleotides, only distances calculated by the method of “complete deletion” are fully comparable. (4) Only distances based on the optimal substitution model should be used. (5) Even within the same locus, corrected genetic distances are unique to the study in which they are calculated, as they are conditional on the particular dataset and model selected for that dataset.

Highlights► We compared methods of calculating genetic distances in the context of barcoding. ► Appropriate distance correction is important but conditional on a particular data set. ► Pairwise deletion of positions with gaps/?/N yield incomparable distance values. ► Distances calculated from different parts of a gene vary extensively. ► Only complete deletion results in comparable values if gene regions are homologous.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution - Volume 62, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 319-328
نویسندگان
, , , ,