کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5921520 | 1571000 | 2014 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- Worker castes of Acromyrmex echinatior differ in aggression against non-nestmates.
- We correlated chemical distance and aggression between colonies.
- Majors are more motivated to attack than medium workers.
- Minors are less sensitive to differences between nestmate and non-nestmate labels.
- A similar pattern emerges when workers discriminate nestmate from non-nestmate brood.
A key feature for the success of social insects is division of labour, allowing colony members to specialize on different tasks. Nest defence is a defining task for social insects since it is crucial for colony integrity. A particularly impressive and well-known case of worker specialization in complex hymenopteran societies is found in leaf-cutting ants of the genera Atta and Acromyrmex. We hypothesized that three morphological worker castes of Acromyrmex echinatior differ in their likelihood to attack intruders, and show that major workers are more aggressive towards non-nestmate workers than medium and minor workers. Moreover, minors do not discriminate between nestmate and non-nestmate brood, while larger workers do. We further show that A. echinatior ants use cuticular chemical compounds for nestmate recognition. We took advantage of the natural variation in the cuticular compounds between colonies to investigate the proximate factors that may have led to the observed caste differences in aggression. We infer that major workers differ from medium workers in their general propensity to attack intruders (the “action component” of the nestmate recognition system), while minors seem to be less sensitive to foreign odours (“perception component”). Our results highlight the importance of proximate mechanisms underlying social insect behaviour, and encourage an appreciation of intra-colony variation when analysing colony-level traits such as nest defence.
Journal: Journal of Insect Physiology - Volume 70, November 2014, Pages 59-66