کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5958976 1175653 2016 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
What is the Yield of Testing for Coronary Artery Disease after an Emergency Department Attendance with Chest Pain?
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
پس از حضور در بخش اورژانس با درد قفسه سینه، نتایج آزمایش برای بیماری عروق کرونر چیست؟
کلمات کلیدی
درد قفسه سینه بخش اورژانس، تست غیر تهاجمی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundGuidelines recommend testing for coronary artery disease (CAD) for emergency department (ED) patients with a negative workup for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The rationale is that, although myocardial infarction has been ruled out, the presentation could still indicate cardiac ischaemia. Evidence supporting this recommendation is weak.MethodsPlanned sub-study of prospective cohort study of ED chest pain patients with a negative ACS workup who were discharged. Primary outcome of interest was occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 30 days. Secondary outcomes were rate of combined MACE or revascularisation and rates and outcome of referral for CAD testing. Analyses were descriptive.Results742 patients were included; median age 56, 52% male. There were two MACE within 30 days (0.3%; 95% CI 0.07-1%). Two patients had revascularisation without ACS - combined MACE or revascularisation rate 0.5% (95% CI 0.2-1.4%). Seventy-five per cent of patients with adverse events had previously known CAD. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome between those referred for testing and those who were not. Age, TIMI score 0-1 and absence of known CAD performed well as potential discriminators for selective testing.ConclusionsIn our study the rate of MACE within 30 days was very low, coronary intervention was rare and most patients with MACE or revascularisation had previously known CAD. For young patients, those without known CAD and those with a low TIMI score, the risk of clinically significant CAD appears to be very low. It adds to the case for abandoning routine testing for CAD.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Heart, Lung and Circulation - Volume 25, Issue 1, January 2016, Pages 12-18
نویسندگان
, ,