کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5965541 | 1576148 | 2016 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- The incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device related complications is increasing.
- Guidelines suggest lead removal via a transvenous approach with little attention placed upon therapeutic options where these fail.
- Surgical guidelines for pacing lead extraction are lacking.
- Step-wise approach increases the likelihood of successful lead removal.
- Emphasis needs to be for on-site cardiothoracic support.
The growing use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has led to infections requiring intervention. These are traditionally managed using a percutaneous transvenous approach to fully extract the culpable leads. Indications for such strategies are well-established and range from simple traction to the use of powered extraction tools including laser sheaths. Where such attempts fail, or if there are further complications, then there may be need for a cardiothoracic surgical approach. Limited evidence is currently available on the merits of individual strategies, and these are mainly drawn from case reports or series. Most utilise cardiopulmonary bypass, cardioplegic arrest and entry within the right atrium to allow direct visualisation of any vegetation and safely explant all CIED components whilst avoiding perforation, valvular and paravalvular damage. In this review, we describe a number of these and the unique challenges faced by surgeons when attempting to extract CIED. It is clear that future work should concentrate on creating clear consensus and guidelines on indications, risks and measures of efficacy outcomes for various surgical techniques.
Journal: International Journal of Cardiology - Volume 203, 15 January 2016, Pages 714-721