کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5966028 | 1576156 | 2015 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

- There is consensus on the antithrombotic therapy for AF patients undergoing PCI.
- There is uncertainty on the antithrombotic therapy for PCI patients developing AF.
- The risk of bleeding with triple therapy is comparable regardless of type of OAC.
- NOACs might be selected as the preferred OAC to be combined in triple therapy.
- The dose of selected NOAC should be individualized based on patient characteristics.
The antithrombotic management of patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC), with either warfarin or non-vitamin K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent (PCI-S) has been recently addressed in a joint European consensus document. In accordance, triple therapy (TT) of OAC, aspirin and clopidogrel should generally be given as the initial therapy. More uncertainty exists over whether warfarin or a NOAC should be added in patients already on dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin and clopidogrel (DAPT) after recent PCI-S. Upon review of available data, it appears that the risk of major bleeding of TT as compared to DAPT is similar with either warfarin or a NOAC. In particular, TT consistently appears associated to an approximately 2.5 fold increase in the risk of major bleeding. Because of the higher convenience, NOACs might be considered the preferred OAC to be added to DAPT. Given the reported different safety profiles of the various NOACs on the incidence of major, and gastrointestinal, bleeding, the NOACs, and the dose, showing the greatest safety in this regard should be selected. In accordance, dabigatran 110Â mg and apixaban 2.5Â mg twice daily appear as the most valuable options in patients who are not and who are respectively, at increased risk of bleeding. As an alternative, apixaban 5Â mg twice daily might be considered in patients at risk of bleeding not increased, whereas rivaroxaban 15Â mg once daily may be considered in the presence of increased risk of bleeding (essentially when related to moderate renal impairment).
Journal: International Journal of Cardiology - Volume 196, 1 October 2015, Pages 133-138