کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5966515 1576158 2015 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) - Angiographic, echocardiographic and hemodynamic assessment in relation to one year outcome
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) - Angiographic, echocardiographic and hemodynamic assessment in relation to one year outcome
چکیده انگلیسی


- We compared three modalities to evaluate aortic regurgitation (AR) after TAVI.
- Angiography, echocardiography and hemodynamics were not correlated.
- Echocardiography was highly reproducible.
- Only echocardiography was able to assess prognostically relevant AR after TAVI.

BackgroundAortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains a relatively frequent and life-limiting complication. However, the most prognostically discriminative (and therefore preferred) technique of AR evaluation after TAVI is not yet clearly defined. The aim of this study was to compare angiographic, echocardiographic and hemodynamic assessment of AR after TAVI in relation to one year outcome.Methods and resultsIn this single center prospective cohort study, angiography (AR grading), echocardiography (AR quantification using color Doppler flow mapping) and invasive hemodynamics (AR index) were assessed before and after TAVI. All patients were followed up to at least one year.A total of 111 consecutive (very) high-risk patients with severe, symptomatic aortic valve stenosis underwent TAVI. No concordant relation could be demonstrated between angiographic, echocardiographic and invasive assessment of AR after TAVI. AR index < 25 post TAVI was significantly influenced by left ventricular posterior wall thickness (odds ratio: 1.276, p = 0.030) and AR index pre TAVI (odds ratio: 0.948, p = 0.019). Neither angiographic nor hemodynamic AR assessments were able to discriminate between good or significantly decreased one year survival. In contrast, color Doppler flow mapping of AR after TAVI was highly reproducible, and able to differentiate between good or significantly decreased one year survival (AR grades 0-I: one year survival 87% vs. AR grades II-III-IV: one year survival 68%, p = 0.035).ConclusionEchocardiography using color Doppler flow mapping is the preferred technique to assess prognostically relevant AR after TAVI.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: International Journal of Cardiology - Volume 194, 1 September 2015, Pages 13-20
نویسندگان
, , , , ,