کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6005511 1184665 2015 11 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Original ArticleRelationship Between Non-invasive Brain Stimulation-induced Plasticity and Capacity for Motor Learning
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مقدمه اصلی بین پلاستیسیته و توانایی ناشی از تحریک مغزی غیر تهاجمی برای یادگیری موتور
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی روانپزشکی بیولوژیکی
چکیده انگلیسی

-MEP changes induced in M1 by NIBS have little or no association with motor learning tasks.-Cortical excitability changes induced in M1 by AtDCS and iTBS are related with reaction time.-Responders to AtDCS and iTBS show faster reaction times.

BackgroundCortical plasticity plays a key role in motor learning (ML). Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) paradigms have been used to modulate plasticity in the human motor cortex in order to facilitate ML. However, little is known about the relationship between NIBS-induced plasticity over M1 and ML capacity.HypothesisNIBS-induced MEP changes are related to ML capacity.Methods56 subjects participated in three NIBS (paired associative stimulation, anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and intermittent theta-burst stimulation), and in three lab-based ML task (serial reaction time, visuomotor adaptation and sequential visual isometric pinch task) sessions.AnalysisAfter clustering the patterns of response to the different NIBS protocols, we compared the ML variables between the different patterns found. We used regression analysis to explore further the relationship between ML capacity and summary measures of the MEPs change. We ran correlations with the “responders” group only.ResultsWe found no differences in ML variables between clusters. Greater response to NIBS protocols may be predictive of poor performance within certain blocks of the VAT. “Responders” to AtDCS and to iTBS showed significantly faster reaction times than “non-responders.” However, the physiological significance of these results is uncertain.ConclusionMEP changes induced in M1 by PAS, AtDCS and iTBS appear to have little, if any, association with the ML capacity tested with the SRTT, the VAT and the SVIPT. However, cortical excitability changes induced in M1 by AtDCS and iTBS may be related to reaction time and retention of newly acquired skills in certain motor learning tasks.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Brain Stimulation - Volume 8, Issue 6, November–December 2015, Pages 1209-1219
نویسندگان
, , ,