کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6016455 | 1580006 | 2016 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Original ArticleSafety profile of incobotulinum toxin A [Xeomin®] in gastrocnemious muscles injections in children with cerebral palsy: Randomized double-blind clinical trial Original ArticleSafety profile of incobotulinum toxin A [Xeomin®] in gastrocnemious muscles injections in children with cerebral palsy: Randomized double-blind clinical trial](/preview/png/6016455.png)
- The treatment with BTX-A is safe in CP children.
- Frequency of adverse events of BTX-A depends from different approach.
- Botox and Xeomin share similar profile of safety in the treatment of calfs in CP.
BackgroundThe only two preparations of botulinum toxin A for which there are published evidences of efficacy in children with cerebral palsy are onabotulinum toxin A (Botox®) and abobotulinum toxin A (Dyport®); these toxins should be considered generally safe and appropriate in the treatment for localized upper and lower limb spasticity.AimsTo establish the safety profile of incobotulinum toxin A (Xeomin®) in children with cerebral palsy and muscle spasticity.MethodsRandomized double-blind controlled trial that involved the recruitment of children of both sexes with spastic hemiplegia or diplegia in cerebral palsy, aged between 3 and 18 years. Children were randomized to either the study group (SG, incobotulinum toxin A) or the control group (CG, onabotulinum toxin A) both to be injected with 5units/kg on gastrocnemius (medialis and lateralis) muscles. The occurrence of adverse events at baseline, after 48Â h, 10 days and 3 months was recorded by the caregivers in a checklist that listed both common and uncommon side effects.Results35 patients were treated (CGÂ =Â 18; SGÂ =Â 17); the 2 groups were well balanced regarding demographics and anthropometry characteristics. At least 1 adverse event occurred in 49% of patients within first 2 days, 46% between 2 and 10 days, and 12% between 10 and 90 days. All the reported events were minor; no serious adverse event was recorded. Fatigue was the most frequent complaint. There was no significant difference in frequency and type of events between the 2 groups.ConclusionIncobotulinum toxin A and onabotulinum toxin A share similar profile of safety in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in CP children.
Journal: European Journal of Paediatric Neurology - Volume 20, Issue 4, July 2016, Pages 532-537