کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6097420 1210289 2015 13 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Original articleClinical endoscopyComparing the effectiveness of competing tests for reducing colorectal cancer mortality: a network meta-analysis
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
آندوسکوپی کلاسیک مقایسه اثربخشی آزمایش های رقابت برای کاهش مرگ و میر سرطان کولورکتال: یک متا آنالیز شبکه
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی بیماری‌های گوارشی
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundComparative effectiveness data pertaining to competing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests do not exist but are necessary to guide clinical decision making and policy.ObjectiveTo perform a comparative synthesis of clinical outcomes studies evaluating the effects of competing tests on CRC-related mortality.DesignTraditional and network meta-analyses. Two reviewers identified studies evaluating the effect of guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), or colonoscopy on CRC-related mortality.InterventionsgFOBT, FS, colonoscopy.Main Outcome MeasurementsTraditional meta-analysis was performed to produce pooled estimates of the effect of each modality on CRC mortality. Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to indirectly compare the effectiveness of screening modalities. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsTraditional meta-analysis revealed that, compared with no intervention, colonoscopy reduced CRC-related mortality by 57% (relative risk [RR] 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.58), whereas FS reduced CRC-related mortality by 40% (RR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45-0.78), and gFOBT reduced CRC-related mortality by 18% (RR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.76-0.88). NMA demonstrated nonsignificant trends favoring colonoscopy over FS (RR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.45-1.11) and FS over gFOBT (RR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51-1.09) for reducing CRC-related deaths. NMA-based simulations, however, revealed that colonoscopy has a 94% probability of being the most effective test for reducing CRC mortality and a 99% probability of being most effective when the analysis is restricted to screening studies.LimitationsRandomized trials and observational studies were combined within the same analysis.ConclusionClinical outcomes studies demonstrate that gFOBT, FS, and colonoscopy are all effective in reducing CRC-related mortality. Network meta-analysis suggests that colonoscopy is the most effective test.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - Volume 81, Issue 3, March 2015, Pages 700-709.e3
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,