کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6098349 1210344 2011 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Original articleClinical endoscopyQuality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos)
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی بیماری‌های گوارشی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Original articleClinical endoscopyQuality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos)
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundStudies suggest that endoscopist-related factors such as colonoscopy withdrawal time are important in determining the adenoma detection rate (ADR).ObjectiveTo determine the importance of withdrawal technique in differentiating among endoscopists with varying ADRs.DesignProspective, multicenter study.SettingFive academic tertiary-care medical centers.ParticipantsThis study involved 11 gastroenterology faculty endoscopists.InterventionA retrospective review of screening colonoscopies was performed to categorize endoscopists into low, moderate, and high ADR groups. Video recordings were randomly obtained for each endoscopist on 20 (10 real, 10 sham) withdrawals during colonoscopies performed for average-risk colorectal cancer screening. Three blinded reviewers assigned withdrawal technique scores (total of 75 points) on 110 video recordings. A separate reviewer recorded withdrawal times.Main Outcome MeasurementsWithdrawal technique scores and withdrawal times.ResultsMean (± standard deviation [SD]) withdrawal technique scores were higher in the moderate (62 ± 2.5) and high (59.5 ± 3) ADR groups compared with the low (40.8±3) ADR group (P = .002). Mean (± SD) withdrawal times were 6.3 ± 1.8 minutes (low ADR), 10.2 ± 1.5 minutes (moderate ADR), and 8.2 ± 1.8 minutes (high ADR) (P = .29). A comparison of the withdrawal times and technique scores of the two individual endoscopists with the lowest and highest ADRs did not find a significant difference in withdrawal times (6.6 ± 1.7 vs 7.4 ± 1.7 minutes) (P = .36) but did find a nearly 2-fold difference in technique scores (36.2 ± 9 vs 62.8 ± 9.9) (P = .0001).LimitationsNot adequately powered to detect small differences in withdrawal times.ConclusionWithdrawal technique is an important indicator that differentiates between endoscopists with varying ADRs. It is possible that withdrawal technique is equal to, if not more important than, withdrawal time in determining ADRs.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - Volume 74, Issue 1, July 2011, Pages 128-134
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,