Research ArticleObliterative portal venopathy: Portal hypertension is not always present at diagnosis

Background & AimsPrevious studies on obliterative portal venopathy (OPV) have been biased due to the selection of patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. The aim of this study was to clarify the characteristics of OVP diagnosed by liver biopsy.MethodsFifty-nine consecutive patients with OPV were retrospectively selected on strict histological criteria. Clinical, laboratory, portal vein patency, and associated disorders potentially involving vascular alterations were analyzed. The occurrence of complications was recorded during follow-up.ResultsMean age at diagnosis was 38.5 ± 15 years old. Initial presentation was portal hypertension (64% of patients) and/or extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis (EHPVT) (22%) or isolated abnormal laboratory tests (20%). Associated diseases found at diagnosis were: prothrombotic disorders (30% of patients) and immune-mediated disorders (17%); 53% of patients had no causal factor (idiopathic OPV). During follow-up (median 8.6 years, range 1-23 years), features of portal hypertension worsened in 46% of patients; EHPVT and portal hypertension were finally found in 44% and 88% of patients. Anti-coagulation and beta-blockers were administered in 47% and 59% of patients, respectively. Severe complications (liver transplantation and/or death) occurred in 11 (19%) patients, 8 had idiopathic OPV. Patients with prothrombotic disorders received earlier anticoagulation therapy; all survived without transplantation.ConclusionsA confident diagnosis of OPV can be done by biopsy and is conceivable in patients under 40 years without clinically significant portal hypertension. Poor outcome was noted in 19% of patients, most of them affected with idiopathic OPV. Patients with prothrombotic disorders received early anticoagulation and appeared to have a better outcome despite a high proportion of EHPVT.