کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6152875 | 1245972 | 2015 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- Most parents are willing to have their children tested for TSE using biomarkers.
- Parents who favor testing desire information for reassurance or motivation.
- Most parents believe testing would motivate behavior change to protect the child.
- Concerns include child's discomfort, mistrust of tests and powerlessness to change.
- TSE biomarker testing is a promising tool for counseling interventions.
ObjectiveWidespread tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) of children suggests that parents may be unaware of their children's exposure. Biomarkers demonstrate exposure and may motivate behavior change, but their acceptability is not well understood.MethodsSixty-five in-depth interviews were conducted with parents of young children, in smoking families in central Israel. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsConsent to testing was associated with desire for information, for reassurance or to motivate change, and with concerns for long-term health, taking responsibility for one's child, and trust in research. Opposition to testing was associated with preference to avoid knowledge, reluctance to cause short-term discomfort, perceived powerlessness, and mistrust of research.Most parents expressed willingness to allow measurement by urine (83%), hair (88%), or saliva (93%), but not blood samples (43%); and believed that test results could motivate behavior change.ConclusionsParents were receptive to non-invasive child biomarker testing. Biomarker information could help persuade parents who smoke that their children need protection.Practice implicationsBiomarker testing of children in smoking families is an acceptable and promising tool for education, counseling, and motivation of parents to protect their children from TSE. Additionally, biomarker testing allows objective assessment of population-level child TSE.
Journal: Patient Education and Counseling - Volume 98, Issue 11, November 2015, Pages 1439-1445