کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6168369 1250342 2011 5 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Emergency Ureteroscopic Removal of Ureteral Calculi After First Colic Attack: Is There Any Advantage?
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی بیماری‌های کلیوی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Emergency Ureteroscopic Removal of Ureteral Calculi After First Colic Attack: Is There Any Advantage?
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveTo comparatively evaluate the efficacy of ureteroscopic stone treatment immediately after the first colic attack and in an electively planned manner.MethodsA total of 145 patients underwent semirigid ureteroscopic removal of obstructive ureteral calculi using 2 different approaches (group 1, 69 patients, and group 2, 76 patients). The 69 patients in group 1 were treated with appropriate medical therapy for a period of ≥7 days for colic pain and subsequently underwent either semirigid ureteroscopy or pneumatic lithotripsy in a planned manner. The 76 patients in group 2 underwent semirigid ureteroscopy after the first colic attack. The stone-free status, auxiliary procedures, and complications were evaluated between the 2 groups using the Mann-Whitney U test; for qualitative data, Fisher's exact test was used.ResultsOf the 145 patients who underwent semirigid ureteroscopy, the mean stone size was 11.80 ± 3.95 mm and 8.32 ± 2.08 mm in the 2 groups. No patient experienced a major complication during or after the procedure. The stone-free rate was 87% and 90.7% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The mean readmission rate to the emergency department for the management of a colic attack was 3.03 ± 2.84 in group 1; no patient in group 2 required readmission.ConclusionUreteroscopic stone removal immediately after the first colic attack in the cases of obstructive ureteral stones proved to be safe and effective. It has the main advantage of offering both immediate stone fragmentation and the relief of acute onset colic pain causing extreme discomfort.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Urology - Volume 78, Issue 3, September 2011, Pages 516-520
نویسندگان
, , , , ,