کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6182977 | 1254057 | 2016 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Independent radiologic review of AURELIA, a phase 3 trial of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer Independent radiologic review of AURELIA, a phase 3 trial of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer](/preview/png/6182977.png)
- IRC-assessed PFS results were consistent with investigator-assessed PFS.
- IRC-assessed PFS was significantly improved with CTÂ +Â bevacizumab vs. CT alone
- Investigator and IRC assessments of PD status and date were concordant.
ObjectiveThe randomized, open-label, phase 3 Avastin® Use in Platinum-Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (AURELIA) trial achieved its primary efficacy end point of significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy (CT) compared with CT alone for platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer. Primary analyses were conducted via investigator assessment of PFS; to confirm primary results, an independent review committee (IRC) retrospectively assessed radiographic data.MethodsPer an amendment to the original study protocol, the IRC reviewed radiographic data from 298 (82.5%) patients in a blinded manner using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modified version 1.0). IRC-assessed PFS and concordance between the two assessments were evaluated.ResultsIRC assessment demonstrated that PFS was significantly prolonged for patients treated with CTÂ +Â bevacizumab compared with CT alone (median, 8.1 vs. 3.9Â months; hazard ratio, 0.484; 95% confidence interval, 0.370-0.632; PÂ <Â 0.0001). Results were similar to the primary PFS analysis from investigator assessment (median, 6.8 vs. 3.4Â months; hazard ratio, 0.384; 95% confidence interval, 0.300-0.491; PÂ <Â 0.0001). Concordance rates for progressive disease status (CTÂ +Â bevacizumab, 68.2%; CT, 69.9%) and date (CTÂ +Â bevacizumab, 67.2%; CT, 69.1%) were similar across treatment arms. Among 161 IRC-evaluable patients declared to have progressive disease by investigator and IRC assessment, 68.3% progressed on the same date as determined by both investigator and IRC.ConclusionsIRC assessment of PFS confirmed the investigator-assessed PFS improvement for patients treated with CTÂ +Â bevacizumab compared with CT alone in the AURELIA study.
Journal: Gynecologic Oncology - Volume 142, Issue 3, September 2016, Pages 465-470