Diagnostic performance of the biomarkers HE4 and CA125 in type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer

- With HE4 and CA125 we can diagnose the aggressive type II EOC at all stages and ages most correctly.
- The diagnostic safety for the dual markers HE4 and CA125 is not acceptable in early stage type I EOC.
- Our results support that EOC should be looked upon as several different diseases.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of HE4 and CA125 in patients presenting with suspicious malignant ovarian cysts. We especially wanted to investigate the levels of HE4 and CA125 with regard to the gene and histology-unifying model of type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).MethodsPlasma from 373 women presenting with a suspicious malignant ovarian cyst was collected prior to surgery. Histology, grade, and stage were determined according to FIGO-classification. HE4 and CA125 were analyzed using ELISA, and the markers were evaluated for significance separately and in combination. Receiver operating curves, the area under the curve, sensitivity and specificity were estimated.ResultsThe combination of HE4 and CA125 resulted in the best diagnostic power in comparing benign tumors to EOC (ROC AUC 0.93, sensitivity 94.4% at 75% specificity) for type II. Diagnostic power in type I (ROC AUC 0.79, sensitivity 61.9% at 75% specificity) was less impressive. In particular, mucinous benign vs. malignant tumors could not significantly be separated by the dual marker combination. Impressively high ROC AUC 0.99 was found for the late stage type II EOC with 100% sensitivity at 75% specificity.ConclusionsHE4 and CA125 have a good ability to diagnose the more aggressive type II tumors but a poor diagnostic ability when patients are presenting with slow-growing type I in the early stage. Our results support the hypothesis that EOC should be looked upon as several different diseases, and that we lack biomarkers for sub-groups of EOC.