Potential Causes of Incomplete Visual Rehabilitation at 6 Months Postoperative After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

PurposeTo determine the various causes of unexpected incomplete visual rehabilitation at 6 months postoperative after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).DesignRetrospective study of prospectively collected data at a tertiary referral center.MethodsFrom a larger group of 400 consecutive DMEK surgeries, the last 200 consecutive eyes were reviewed for visual discomfort despite a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of ≥20/25 (≥0.8) or unexpected subnormal BCVA (≤20/28; ≤0.7) at 6 months after DMEK. Biomicroscopy, funduscopy, Pentacam imaging, noncontact specular microscopy, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, and surgical videos were used to determine the causes of incomplete visual rehabilitation.ResultsA total of 69 eyes out of 178 eyes that were included in the analysis (38.8%) presented with incomplete visual rehabilitation after DMEK, further categorized as “primarily patient-related” in 40 of 178 (22.5%), “primarily graft-related” in 21 of 178 (11.8%), and a combination of “patient-/graft-related” in 8 of 178 cases (4.5%). Unrecognized pre-existing ocular pathology and/or posterior segment disease in 19 of 178 eyes (10.7%), clinically significant corneal irregularities and/or central corneal scarring often secondary to long-standing preoperative corneal edema in 14 of 178 eyes (7.9%), or (partial) graft detachment in 20 of 178 eyes (11.2%) were the main causes of unexpected incomplete visual rehabilitation. Transient or persistent monocular ghost images or diplopia occurred in 10 of 178 eyes (5.6%), sometimes requiring contact lens fitting.ConclusionsIn contrast to earlier endothelial keratoplasty techniques that may frequently be associated with undefined transplant-related subnormal visual outcomes, incomplete visual rehabilitation after DMEK may virtually always be explained by concomitant ocular pathology or evident graft failure.