Comparison of plantar pressures and contact area between normal and cavus foot

- Pes cavus had a significant reduction in the weight-bearing area of the foot.
- Pes cavus had higher baropodometry records in metatarsal area than the normal foot.
- The distribution of the load in metatarsal area is similar in cavus and normal foot.

BackgroundIn pes cavus, the medial longitudinal arch elevation reduces the contact surface area and consequently increases the corresponding plantar pressure measurements. This poor distribution of loads may produce associated pathology and pain in this or other areas of the body. Normal reference values need to be established in order to determine which patterns are prone to pathology.ObjectivesTo compare the plantar pressures and weight-bearing surface in a population with pes cavus to a population with neutral feet.MethodThe sample comprised 68 adults, 34 with pes cavus and 34 with neutral feet. The Footscan USB Gait Clinical System® was used as a platform to measure the total contact area and plantar pressure under the forefoot, midfoot, hindfoot, each metatarsal head, and the overall metatarsal area. A statistical analysis of the data was performed using Student's t-test for independent samples.ResultsThe pes cavus subjects showed a significant reduction in their weight-bearing area [neutral feet: 165.04 (±20.68) cm2; pes cavus: 118.26 (±30.31) cm2; p < 0.001] and significantly increased pressures under all zones of the forefoot except the fifth metatarsal [metatarsal pressure: in neutral feet 503,797 (±9.32) kPa; in pes cavus 656.12 (±22.39) kPa; p < 0.001].ConclusionsCompared to neutral feet, pes cavus feet show a reduction in total contact surface and the load under the first toe. A significant increase is present in the load under the metatarsal areas, but the relative distribution of this load is similar in both groups.