کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6239729 1279007 2014 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Managed entry agreements for pharmaceuticals in Australia
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
توافق ورودی مدیریت برای داروها در استرالیا
کلمات کلیدی
سیاست دارویی، توافقنامه ورود به مدیریت یارانه پزشکی، پوشش با توسعه شواهد،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی سیاست های بهداشت و سلامت عمومی
چکیده انگلیسی


- In Australia, managed entry agreements enable coverage of new medicines.
- In February 2013, there were at least 71 special pricing arrangements in place.
- 28 medicines were subject to continuation rules.
- One health outcome based agreement has been implemented so far.
- A new 'Managed Entry Scheme' has not been trialed yet.

In Australia, a number of managed entry agreements have been developed to enable national coverage of new medicines. Non-outcome based agreements are usually pricing arrangements that involve price or volume rebate agreements. In February 2013, there were at least 71 special pricing arrangements in place, including 26 for medicines restricted to use in hospitals. Health outcome based agreements can be made at the individual or population level. At the individual level, there were 28 medicines funded subject to continuation rules involving documentation of adequate benefit within the individual; some of these medicines also had price agreements in place. At the population level, only one outcome-based agreement has been implemented so far, for bosentan, a medicine marketed for pulmonary hypertension. In May 2010, a memorandum of understanding signed between the Australian Government and Medicines Australia, the peak pharmaceutical industry organisation, included the possibility for industry to request consideration of a 'Managed Entry Scheme' as part of the funding submission process for medicines with high clinical needs. It includes the possibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT)-based entry scheme. Although this form of managed entry has yet not been trialed in Australia, several 2012/2013 funding recommendations included requests by the decision making committee for further evidence development.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Health Policy - Volume 117, Issue 3, September 2014, Pages 345-352
نویسندگان
, ,