کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6257853 | 1612957 | 2014 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- Rats reject a devalued reward, but typically recover from such negative contrast.
- Latent growth mixture modeling (LGMM) detected three distinct recovery profiles.
- The Recovery, No Recovery, and No Contrast profiles were detected in a large sample.
- These heterogeneous subpopulations enhance the validity and translatability of negative contrast.
- Negative contrast relates to anxiety, depression, and emotional self-medication.
In humans and other mammals, the unexpected loss of a resource can lead to emotional conflict. Consummatory successive negative contrast (cSNC) is a laboratory model of reward devaluation meant to capture that conflict. In this paradigm, animals are exposed to a sharp reduction in the sucrose concentration of a solution after several days of access. This downshift in sucrose content leads to behavioral responses such as the suppression of consumption and physiologic responses including elevation of corticosterone levels. However, response heterogeneity in cSNC has yet to be explored and may be relevant for increasing the validity of this model, as humans demonstrate clinically meaningful heterogeneity in response to resource loss. The current analysis applied latent growth mixture modeling to test for and characterize heterogeneity in recovery from cSNC among rats (NÂ =Â 262). Although most animals exhibited recovery of consummatory behavior after a sharp drop in consumption in the first postshift trial (Recovery class; 83%), two additional classes were identified including animals that did not change their consumption levels after downshift (No Contrast class; 6%), and animals that exhibited an initial response similar to that of the Recovery class but did not recover to preshift consumption levels (No Recovery class; 11%). These results indicate heterogeneity in recovery from reward loss among rats, which may increase the translatability of this animal model to understand diverse responses to loss among humans.
Journal: Behavioural Brain Research - Volume 275, 15 December 2014, Pages 212-218