کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6269005 | 1295113 | 2013 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
Complex networks constitute a recurring issue in the analysis of neuroimaging data. Recently, network motifs have been identified as patterns of interconnections since they appear in a significantly higher number than in randomized networks, in a given ensemble of anatomical or functional connectivity graphs. The current approach for detecting and enumerating motifs in brain networks requires a predetermined motif repertoire and can operate only with motifs of small size (consisting of few nodes).There is a growing interest in methodologies for frequent graph-based pattern mining in large graph datasets that can facilitate adaptive design of motifs. The results presented in this paper are based on the graph-based Substructure pattern mining (gSpan) algorithm and introduce a manifold of ways to exploit it for data-driven motif extraction in connectomics research.Functional connectivity graphs from electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings during resting state and mental calculations are used to demonstrate our approach. Relying on either time-invariant or time-evolving graphs, characteristic motifs associated with various frequency bands were derived and compared. With a suitable manipulation, the gSpan discovers motifs which are specific to performing mental arithmetics. Finally, the subject-dependent temporal signatures of motifs' appearance revealed the transient nature of the evolving functional connectivity (math-related motifs “come and go”).
⺠We introduce a potential alternative to current techniques for generating motif repertoire in brain connectivity research. ⺠We indicate, using actual functional connectivity graphs, various ways to exploit the new technique for gaining insights to assembled connectivity graph datasets. ⺠Using the proposed contrastive learning scheme for motif extraction we finally score and rank the detected motifs according to their importance.
Journal: Journal of Neuroscience Methods - Volume 213, Issue 2, 15 March 2013, Pages 204-213