ReviewRevisiting the adaptive and maladaptive effects of crossmodal plasticity

- Crossmodal plasticity is conceived as ultimately adaptive in sensory deprivations.
- Crossmodal plasticity is conceived as ultimately maladaptive in sensory restoration.
- The dichotomic vision of crossmodal plasticity effects is oversimplified.
- Crossmodal plasticity may underlie impaired behaviors in deprived individuals.
- Functional-selective crossmodal plasticity may facilitate sensory recovery.

One of the most striking demonstrations of experience-dependent plasticity comes from studies of sensory-deprived individuals (e.g., blind or deaf), showing that brain regions deprived of their natural inputs change their sensory tuning to support the processing of inputs coming from the spared senses. These mechanisms of crossmodal plasticity have been traditionally conceptualized as having a double-edged sword effect on behavior. On one side, crossmodal plasticity is conceived as adaptive for the development of enhanced behavioral skills in the remaining senses of early-deaf or blind individuals. On the other side, crossmodal plasticity raises crucial challenges for sensory restoration and is typically conceived as maladaptive since its presence may prevent optimal recovery in sensory-re-afferented individuals. In the present review we stress that this dichotomic vision is oversimplified and we emphasize that the notions of the unavoidable adaptive/maladaptive effects of crossmodal reorganization for sensory compensation/restoration may actually be misleading. For this purpose we critically review the findings from the blind and deaf literatures, highlighting the complementary nature of these two fields of research. The integrated framework we propose here has the potential to impact on the way rehabilitation programs for sensory recovery are carried out, with the promising prospect of eventually improving their final outcomes.