کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6277928 | 1295777 | 2009 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Why “late equals large” does not work
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری
علم عصب شناسی
علوم اعصاب (عمومی)
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
چکیده انگلیسی
The concept of conservative scaling of mammalian brain subdivision size with respect to brain size is one of the more contentious issues in neuromorphological studies. What is generally less critically discussed is the widely-cited suggestion that a highly conserved neurogenetic sequence during brain development is the reason for this conservative scaling and other processes of mammalian brain evolution. Here I re-visit the data with which the influential notion of conserved neurogenesis and mechanistic relationship between neurogenesis and mammalian brain subdivision scaling was developed. I suggest that neurogenetic sequences in the species available are not particularly conserved, and that brain subdivision sizes do not correspond well with neurogenetic sequence timing. As an alternative, I propose favouring less generalized and more heterochrony-focused approaches of relating timing differences between species to adult morphology.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Neuroscience - Volume 164, Issue 4, 29 December 2009, Pages 1648-1652
Journal: Neuroscience - Volume 164, Issue 4, 29 December 2009, Pages 1648-1652
نویسندگان
V. Weisbecker,