کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6461506 1421824 2016 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A wild controversy: Cooperation and competition among landowners, hunters, and other outdoor recreational land-users in Denmark
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مناقشات وحشی: همکاری و رقابت بین مالکان، شکارچیان و سایر کاربرانی که زمین های تفریحی در فضای باز در دانمارک دارند
کلمات کلیدی
استفاده چندگانه زمین، مدیریت اختلاف، سرگرمی بیرون از خانه، شکار، وابستگی متقابل اجتماعی، رقابت همکاری
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک جنگلداری
چکیده انگلیسی


- Relatively few negative encounters between hunters and others users.
- Low conflict levels explained by collaborative approaches taken by parties.
- Social interdependence theory may help predict land use conflict and support policy- making.
- A revised analytical framework for analyzing such land use conflicts is provided.

This paper examines cooperation and competition among landowners, hunters, and other outdoor recreational land-users in Denmark in relation to recreational hunting. The study used an internet-based questionnaire, sent to representative samples of, respectively, the Danish public (n = 1001), hunters (n = 1130) and landowners (n = 1207). A series of qualitative interviews with a sample of landowners and hunters determined their approach to conflict management. The findings showed that relatively few negative encounters take place between hunters and other users compared to the frequency of such incidents between other outdoor recreational users. The relatively low levels of conflict may be explained by the more collaborative approach taken by hunters and landowners (who provide hunting opportunities) and the low degree of interdependence between hunters and other recreational users. Information about conflicts and ways of handling them may help predict and address future sites of potential negative interactions between different user groups and hunters, given changes in land management or policy-making. The article proposes a revised analytical framework for analyzing such conflicts.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Land Use Policy - Volume 59, 31 December 2016, Pages 197-206
نویسندگان
, ,