کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6463298 | 1422502 | 2017 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- First descriptive and qualitative account of ballistic analyses in Europe
- Inconsistencies in ballistic data recording practices and definitions
- Need for an agreed standard protocol for best practice
- Fragmented picture of ballistic analysis and lack of system interoperability
The current study explored the use of ballistic examinations and cross-border information sharing across 14 European countries. The presented data were collected using a mixed methods technique consisting of semi-structured interviews and questionnaires that were completed by participants. The results painted a very heterogeneous picture of the use of automated ballistic systems across these countries, as well as how ballistic analyses are integrated in the fight against gun-enabled crime. Three super-ordinates themes emerged from the thematic analysis: use of automated ballistic systems; Ballistic evidence recovery and analysis; knowledge exchange and best practices. The ability to draw firm conclusions regarding the value of ballistics comparison systems, either on a national or cross-border basis, is hampered by inconsistencies regarding data recording practices and definitions. Therefore, key recommendations are suggested to establish better cross border cooperation between member states and develop a better understanding of data sharing procedures.
Journal: Science & Justice - Volume 57, Issue 5, September 2017, Pages 384-393