کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
677199 | 1459847 | 2012 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Biomass production of four willow clones grown as short rotation coppice on two soil types in Denmark Biomass production of four willow clones grown as short rotation coppice on two soil types in Denmark](/preview/png/677199.png)
Ambitious targets for reducing emissions of carbon dioxide have created a demand for renewable sources of energy. Short rotation coppice (SRC) willow has the potential for meeting part of this demand. In this study, an experiment including four commercial clones of willow grown on two different soil types in northern Denmark is reported. Annual biomass production was estimated after the first and second growing season in the first rotation using a non-destructive method and total biomass production was measured by harvesting of the willow after the second growing season. The non-destructive method showed a large increase in annual biomass production from the first to the second growing season. Based on the harvested willow, average annual biomass production of the four clones ranged from 5.2 to 8.8 odt ha−1 yr−1 with a significant effect of both soil type and clone. The interaction between clones and soil types was also significant, indicating that different clones may be better suited for different soil types. On average, estimates of annual biomass production obtained by non-destructive estimation exceeded those obtained by destructive methods by 1.2 odt ha−1 yr−1. This bias indicates a need to revise commonly used methods for assessment of biomass production in SRC willow.
► SRC willow has the potential for increasing the current production of biomass for energy.
► We evaluated the biomass production of 4 SRC willow clones grown on 2 different soil types.
► Average biomass production was 5.2–8.8 odt ha−1 yr−1 in the first rotation.
► Soil type and choice of clone has significant effects on biomass production.
► Biomass estimates obtained by non-destructive estimation were biased.
Journal: Biomass and Bioenergy - Volume 46, November 2012, Pages 664–672