کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
7264162 | 1472856 | 2015 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Content specificity of attention bias to threat in anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ویژگی محتوای توجه به تهدید در اختلالات اضطرابی: یک متاآنالیز
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
تهدید، توجه اضطراب، اصلاح تعصب توجه،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت
پزشکی و دندانپزشکی
روانپزشکی و بهداشت روانی
چکیده انگلیسی
Despite the established evidence for threat-related attention bias in anxiety, the mechanisms underlying this bias remain unclear. One important unresolved question is whether disorder-congruent threats capture attention to a greater extent than do more general or disorder-incongruent threat stimuli. Evidence for attention bias specificity in anxiety would implicate involvement of previous learning and memory processes in threat-related attention bias, whereas lack of content specificity would point to perturbations in more generic attention processes. Enhanced clarity of mechanism could have clinical implications for the stimuli types used in Attention Bias Modification Treatments (ABMT). Content specificity of threat-related attention bias in anxiety and potential moderators of this effect were investigated. A systematic search identified 37 samples from 29 articles (N = 866). Relevant data were extracted based on specific coding rules, and Cohen's d effect size was used to estimate bias specificity effects. The results indicate greater attention bias toward disorder-congruent relative to disorder-incongruent threat stimuli (d = 0.28, p < 0.0001). This effect was not moderated by age, type of anxiety disorder, visual attention tasks, or type of disorder-incongruent stimuli. No evidence of publication bias was observed. Implications for threat bias in anxiety and ABMT are discussed.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Clinical Psychology Review - Volume 35, February 2015, Pages 10-18
Journal: Clinical Psychology Review - Volume 35, February 2015, Pages 10-18
نویسندگان
Lee Pergamin-Hight, Reut Naim, Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, Yair Bar-Haim,