کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
7272242 1473337 2018 13 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Invited Commentary: Interpreting failed replications of early false-belief findings: Methodological and theoretical considerations
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
تفسیر دعوت شده: تفسیر تکرارهای ناموفق یافته های اولیه باور اشتباه: ملاحظات روش شناختی و نظری
کلمات کلیدی
نظریه ذهن، درک باور نادرست، تکثیر، وظیفه باور نادرست اشتباه،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی روانشناسی روانشناسی رشد و آموزشی
چکیده انگلیسی
There are now over 30 published reports, spanning 11 different methods, providing convergent evidence for false-belief understanding in children ages 6-36 months (for a review, see Scott & Baillargeon, 2017). The negative findings reported in this special issue of Cognitive Development are inconsistent with this body of data, and the aim of this commentary is to try to shed some light on the discrepancies between studies. We examine the negative findings reported with violation-of-expectation tasks (written by R. Baillargeon), interactive tasks (written by D. Buttelmann), and anticipatory-looking tasks (written by V. Southgate). In many cases, procedural differences between studies may explain failures to replicate. In other cases, apparent participant motivation and attention differences may be important in explaining failures, raising doubts about the utility of some paradigms to elicit the behaviors on which they rely. Our hope is that this commentary will provide a useful analysis that will inform the design of future studies in order that a higher level of replication can be achieved.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Cognitive Development - Volume 46, April–June 2018, Pages 112-124
نویسندگان
, , ,