کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
7287782 | 1474148 | 2018 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
On investigating inner experience: Contrasting Moore & Schwitzgebel and Brouwers et al.
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری
علم عصب شناسی
علوم اعصاب شناختی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
چکیده انگلیسی
Moore and Schwitzgebel (this issue) reported that readers report innerly speak the text about 59% of the time. Brouwers et al. (2018) reported that readers innerly speak the text only about 3% of the time. I use this huge discrepancy as a case study to discuss important issues in the investigation of inner experience, including: the training of participants; ambiguity in the time being considered; ambiguity in the phenomenon; the desirability of investigating the phenomenon itself, not merely its frequency; bracketing presuppositions; the advantages and disadvantages of large and small sample sizes; influence by the investigator; and the slide from phenomena to reports of phenomena.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Consciousness and Cognition - Volume 63, August 2018, Pages 146-150
Journal: Consciousness and Cognition - Volume 63, August 2018, Pages 146-150
نویسندگان
Russell T. Hurlburt,