کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
731091 1461521 2015 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Recommended practices for the use of spinning rotor gauges in inter-laboratory comparisons
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
روش های توصیه شده برای استفاده از سنجنده های روتور چرخشی در مقایسه بین آزمایشگاهی
کلمات کلیدی
سنجش روتور چرخان، مقایسه کلیدی، استانداردهای خلاء، پایداری خلاء مترولوژی خلاء، ثبات بلند مدت
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه سایر رشته های مهندسی کنترل و سیستم های مهندسی
چکیده انگلیسی


• The spinning rotor gauge is a common transfer standard in high-vacuum comparisons.
• Factors affecting gauge stability are discussed.
• The stability of SRGs in various key comparisons is summarized.
• A set of recommended practices for using spinning rotor gauges is given.

The spinning rotor gauge (SRG) is a common transfer standard in key comparisons (KCs) and other intercomparisons for pressures in the range of 1.0 × 10−4 Pa to 1.0 Pa. To make absolute pressure measurements using a SRG, a calibration factor, known as the accommodation coefficient, must be determined. Comparisons which utilize SRGs require each participant to determine the accommodation coefficient. The accommodation coefficient of an SRG is known to have excellent long-term stability (⩽0.1% over 1 year; k = 1) in a laboratory environment where the rotor remains undisturbed and attached to a vacuum standard, but the long-term stability of SRGs used in comparisons is often worse than what is observed in the participants own laboratory. Recently, the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities Working Group on Low Pressures held a workshop to discuss the stability of the accommodation coefficient in inter-laboratory comparisons. Here we summarize the data presented during the workshop and the ensuing discussions and give a list of recommended practices derived from the workshop.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Measurement - Volume 66, April 2015, Pages 176–183
نویسندگان
, , , , ,