Fatigue crack paths in AA2024-T3 when loaded with constant amplitude and simple underload spectra

It is well known that variable amplitude fatigue loading produces progression marks on fatigue crack surfaces that are related to the loading sequence. These marks are generally a local change in the crack path. The same pattern of loading can produce a pattern of progression marks that have differences from material-to-material or from heat treatment-to-heat treatment, yet the crack path changes that produce these markings are not considered in the prediction of the crack growth behaviour. These path changes can be used to: investigate how the crack grows, aid crack growth measurement and shed light on the mechanism that forms striations. Consequently, an understanding of these path changes and their fundamental cause in structurally significant alloys is important to the explanation of how fatigue cracks grow and how their life can be predicted.In this paper, a number of simple loading sequences were used to investigate the influence that underloads have on the crack path, to develop a better understanding of the formation of fatigue striations and the coarser crack path changes associated with loading changes. The material chosen was aluminium alloy (AA)2024-T3. The results from the tests reported here were compared to previously investigated AA7050-T7451 specimens that were loaded in a similar manner. It is shown that the fatigue crack surfaces that were produced here were the direct consequence of the applied loading interacting with the crystal structure of the material. By changing the loading, via the addition of underloads it was possible to produce fatigue crack surfaces that where composed of not only striations but ridges, depressions and fissures. These features give an indication of the crack growth mechanism. Although, AA2024-T3 and AA7050-T7451 have different chemical compositions, mechanical properties and micro-structures, it was shown that both materials share essentially similar fracture features corresponding to crack propagation at the cycle-by-cycle level. It also appears that despite the above noted differences, similar failure mechanisms may take place.