کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
811444 1469146 2011 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Porcine extracellular matrix scaffolds in reconstructive urology: An ex vivo comparative study of their biomechanical properties
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه سایر رشته های مهندسی مهندسی پزشکی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Porcine extracellular matrix scaffolds in reconstructive urology: An ex vivo comparative study of their biomechanical properties
چکیده انگلیسی

Functional reconstruction of the human urinary bladder has been attempted by replacing defective bladder tissue with tissue-engineered xenogenic extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds. However, experimental studies that demonstrate the effects of implanted ECMs on important biomechanical properties such as total bladder capacity (TBC) and compliance (CC) are lacking. In the current study, the effects of ECM scaffold surface area (SA) on TBC and CC was assessed, ex vivo  , in an ovine model (n=5n=5). TBC and CC were measured at pressures (PP) of 5, 10, 15 and 20 mm Hg prior to performing a 3×3 cm (9 cm2) partial cystectomy defect. Equal-sized 3×3 cm (9 cm2) and larger 6×6 cm (36 cm2) urinary bladder matrix (UBM) scaffolds of porcine origin replaced the 3×3 cm cystectomy defect, and TBC and CC were re-recorded for comparative analysis. The results showed that TBC decreased by 39.6%±0.005% (122.9 ml±15 ml, p<0.05p<0.05) and CC by 38.9%±0.51%, (ΔP=0–5mmHg, p<0.05p<0.05) in ovine bladders reconstructed with 3×3 cm UBM scaffolds compared to their native values. It was also found that TBC increased by 25.6±0.64% (64.2 ml ± 8.8 ml, p>0.05p>0.05) and CC by 24.5±0.43% (ΔP=0–5mmHg, p>0.05p>0.05) in the 6×6 cm UBM scaffold group compared to the 3×3 cm UBM scaffold group; however, these values were not statistically significant. The present work demonstrates that a fourfold increase in ECM scaffold SA relative to its intended defect does not lead to a significant improvement in TBC and CC values.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials - Volume 4, Issue 3, April 2011, Pages 375–382
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,