کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
8556501 | 1562817 | 2018 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Diez cuestiones que deberÃa considerar antes de enviar un artÃculo a una revista cientÃfica
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت
پرستاری و مشاغل بهداشتی
امداد اورژانس
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Diez cuestiones que deberÃa considerar antes de enviar un artÃculo a una revista cientÃfica Diez cuestiones que deberÃa considerar antes de enviar un artÃculo a una revista cientÃfica](/preview/png/8556501.png)
چکیده انگلیسی
Investigating involves not only knowing the research methods and designs; it involves knowing the strategies for disseminating and publishing the results in scientific journals. An investigation is considered complete when it is published and is disclosed to the scientific community. The publication of a manuscript is not simple, since it involves examination by a rigorous editorial process evaluator to ensure the scientific quality of the proposal. The objective of this article is to communicate to potential authors the main errors or deficiencies that typically and routinely explain the decision by the referees of scientific journals not to accept a scientific article. Based on the experience of the authors as referees of national and international journals in the field of nursing and health sciences, we have identified a total of 10 types or groups, which cover formulation errors, inconsistencies between different parts of the text, lack of structuring, imprecise language, information gaps, and the detection of relevant inaccuracies. The identification and analysis of these issues enables their prevention, and is of great use to future researchers in the dissemination of the results of their work to the scientific community. In short, the best publishing strategy is one that ensures the scientific quality of the work and spares no effort in avoiding the errors or deficiencies that referees routinely detect in the articles they evaluate.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: EnfermerÃa Intensiva - Volume 29, Issue 2, AprilâJune 2018, Pages 80-85
Journal: EnfermerÃa Intensiva - Volume 29, Issue 2, AprilâJune 2018, Pages 80-85
نویسندگان
A. PhD, MSc, RN, D. PhD, MSc, RN,