The inaccuracy of surface-measured model-derived tibiofemoral kinematics

This study assessed the accuracy of surface-measured OpenSim-derived tibiofemoral kinematics in functional activities. Ten subjects with unilateral, isolated grade II PCL deficiency performed level running and stair ascent. A dynamic stereo radiography (DSX) system and a Vicon motion capture system simultaneously measured their knee or lower extremity movement. Surface marker motion data from the Vicon system were used to create subject-specific models in OpenSim and derive the tibiofemoral kinematics. The surface-measured model-derived tibiofemoral kinematics in all six degrees of freedom (DOFs) were then compared with those measured by the DSX as the benchmarks. The differences between surface- and DSX-measured tibiofemoral kinematics were found to be substantial: the overall mean (±SD) RMS differences during running were 9.1±3.2°, 2.0±1.2°, and 6.4±4.5° for the flexion–extension, abduction–adduction, and internal–external rotations, respectively, and 7.1±3.2 mm, 8.8±3.7 mm, and 1.9±1.2 mm for anterior–posterior, proximal–distal, and medial–lateral translations, respectively. The differences were more pronounced in relatively higher speed running than in stair ascent. It was also found that surface-based measures significantly underestimated the mean as well as inter-subject variability of the differences between PCL-injured and intact knees in abduction–adduction, internal–external rotations, and anterior–posterior translation.