کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
8724608 | 1589861 | 2017 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Recent diagnostic procedures for colorectal cancer screening: Are they cost-effective?
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
روشهای تشخیصی اخیر برای غربالگری سرطان کولورکتال: آیا آنها مقرون به صرفه هستند؟
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
Abdominal aortic aneurismCTCFOBTHNPCCWTPUSPSTFNHSICERFAPAAACeA - CEACost-effectiveness - اثربخشی هزینهCost-effective analysis - تجزیه و تحلیل هزینه-موثرWillingness to pay - تمایل به پرداختGDP - تولید ناخالص ملیDiagnostic procedures - روش های تشخیصیCer - سرColorectal cancer - سرطان روده بزرگhereditary non-polyposis colon cancer - سرطان کولون غیرپلیپوز ارثیNational Health System - سیستم بهداشت ملیScreening - غربالگریLYS - لیستIncremental cost-effectiveness ratio - نسبت هزینه-بهره وری افزایشیUnited States Preventive Services Task Force - نیروی کار ایالات متحده خدمات پیشگیرانه خدماتColonoscopy - پسرودهبینی یا کولونبینی یا کولونوسکوپیfamilial polyposis - پولیپوس خانوادگیCRC - کد افزونگی دورهای Colonography - کلونوگرافی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت
پزشکی و دندانپزشکی
بیماریهای گوارشی
چکیده انگلیسی
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cause of death. Reduction in mortality rates in some countries worldwide are most likely ascribed to CRC screening and/or improved treatments. We reviewed the most relevant articles which discuss the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening procedures, in particular, the recent ones through the last eight years. The effectiveness of screening estimated by discounted life years gained (LYGs) compared to no screening, differed considerably between the studies. Despite these differences, all studies consistently emphasized that screening for CRC was cost-effective compared with no screening for each of the recognized screening strategies. Newer technologies for colorectal cancer screening, including computed tomographic colonography (CTC), faecal DNA test, and Pillcam Colon are less invasive and accurate, however, they are not cost-effective, as their cost was higher than all other established screening strategies. When compliance and adherence to such new techniques are increased more than the established strategies they would be more cost-effective particularly CTC.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Arab Journal of Gastroenterology - Volume 18, Issue 3, September 2017, Pages 136-139
Journal: Arab Journal of Gastroenterology - Volume 18, Issue 3, September 2017, Pages 136-139
نویسندگان
Mostafa Ahmed Arafa, Karim Hamda Farhat,