کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
883477 1471654 2015 26 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
The economic origins of the evil eye belief
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ریشه های اقتصادی چشم عقل چشم چیست؟
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی اقتصاد، اقتصادسنجی و امور مالی اقتصاد و اقتصادسنجی
چکیده انگلیسی


• The evil eye belief is a heuristic prescribing envy-avoidance behavior.
• The evil eye belief is a useful cultural norm in societies with weak institutions.
• The prevalence of the evil eye belief is positively associated with inequality.
• The evil eye belief is more widespread in agro-pastoral societies.

The evil eye belief is a widespread superstition according to which people can cause harm by a mere envious glance at coveted objects or their owners. This paper argues that such belief originated and persisted as a useful heuristic under conditions in which envy was likely to trigger destructive behavior and the avoidance of other people's envy, effectively prescribed by the evil eye belief, was a proper response to that threat. We hypothesize that in weakly institutionalized societies wealth differentiation and vulnerability of productive assets were the key factors enabling envy-induced destructive behavior and contributing to the emergence and spread of the evil eye belief as a cultural defense mechanism. Evidence from small-scale preindustrial societies shows that there is indeed a robust positive association between the incidence of the belief and measures of wealth inequality, controlling for potential confounding factors such as patterns of spatial and cross-cultural diffusion and various dimensions of early economic development. Furthermore, the evil eye belief is more prevalent in agro-pastoral societies that tend to sustain higher levels of inequality and where vulnerable material wealth plays a dominant role in the subsistence economy.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization - Volume 110, February 2015, Pages 119–144
نویسندگان
,