کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
888531 913546 2014 12 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Not competent enough to know the difference? Gender stereotypes about women’s ease of being misled predict negotiator deception
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
به اندازه کافی صحیح نیست که تفاوت را بشناسید؟ کلیشه های جنسیتی در مورد زنان به دلیل اشتباه بودن، پیش بینی اشتباهات مذاکره کننده را پیش بینی می کنند
کلمات کلیدی
کلیشه های جنسیتی، فریب، مذاکره، صلاحیت، گرما، بررسی موشکافانه، استانداردهای اخلاقی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی مدیریت، کسب و کار و حسابداری بازاریابی و مدیریت بازار
چکیده انگلیسی


• We examined gender stereotypes about the perceived ease of being misled.
• Women are perceived to be easier to mislead in negotiations than men.
• The perceived ease of being misled corresponds with perceived low competence.
• Women are deceived more than men in distributive negotiations.

We examined whether gender differences in the perceived ease of being misled predict the likelihood of being deceived in distributive negotiations. Study 1 (N = 131) confirmed that female negotiators are perceived as more easily misled than male negotiators. This perception corresponded with perceptions of women’s relatively low competence. Study 2 (N = 328) manipulated negotiator gender, competence and warmth and found that being perceived as easily misled via low competence affected expectations about the negotiating process, including less deception scrutiny among easily misled negotiators and lower ethical standards among their negotiating counterparts. This pattern held true regardless of buyer and seller gender. Study 3 (N = 298) examined whether patterns of deception in face-to-face negotiations were consistent with this gender stereotype. As expected, negotiators deceived women more so than men, thus leading women into more deals under false pretenses than men.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes - Volume 125, Issue 2, November 2014, Pages 61–72
نویسندگان
, , ,