Reliability of measures of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions with contralateral suppression

• Reliability of suppression of TEOAEs was examined as a function of test, gender, and ear in adults.
• Reliability of TEOAE suppression was assessed with multiple statistical measures.
• Data were consistent with the notion that TEOAE suppression is reliable across 1–2 days.

The reliability of measures of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) with contralateral suppression was examined. The effect of test session (i.e., initial test; retest without probe removal; retest with probe removal; and retest 1–2 days post initial test), gender, and ear was examined in 14 young adult females and 14 young adult males. TEOAEs were obtained bilaterally with 60 dB peSPL linear click stimuli with and without a contralateral 65 dB SPL broadband noise suppressor. Absolute TEOAE suppression and a normalized index of TEOAE suppression (i.e., percentage of suppression) were examined. Reliability of these measures was assessed with repeated measures linear mixed model analysis of variance, a coefficient of reliability, and Bland–Altman analyses. There were no statistically significant (p > 0.05) main effects of test, gender, and ear or interactions for both absolute dB and % TEOAE suppression values. Cronbach's α were greater than 0.90 across the four tests for both TEOAE measures. Mean test differences or bias (i.e., between the initial and subsequent tests) for absolute and % TEOAE suppression ranged from −0.05 to 0.11 dB and −1.5% to 1.1%, respectively. There was no proportional/systematic bias with the mean differences of the first and subsequent measurements. Data herein were consistent with the view that bilateral TEOAE suppression measures are reliable across test sessions of 1–2 days among females and males and may provide a method to monitor medial olivocochlear efferent reflex status over time.