کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
911760 1473177 2014 21 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
The forgotten grammatical category: Adjective use in agrammatic aphasia
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
طبقه بندی فراموشی دستوری: استفاده از واژگان در آستانه ی یکپارچه
کلمات کلیدی
آگماتیک قارچی، دسته بندی های گرامر صفت، سخن گفتاری، ساختار استدلال، افزودن
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی علوم اعصاب شناختی
چکیده انگلیسی


• The study investigates adjective use in narrative speech in agrammatic aphasia.
• Overall agrammatic speakers produce adjectives in similar proportions to controls.
• This suggests that verb deficits are not due to predication or low imageability.
• Agrammatic speakers show deficits with attribution and argument-taking adjectives.
• This extends previous findings from the verbal domain to the adjectival domain.

BackgroundIn contrast to nouns and verbs, the use of adjectives in agrammatic aphasia has not been systematically studied. However, because of the linguistic and psycholinguistic attributes of adjectives, some of which overlap with nouns and some with verbs, analysis of adjective production is important for testing theories of word class production deficits in agrammatism.AimsThe objective of the current study was to compare adjective use in agrammatic and healthy individuals, focusing on three factors: overall adjective production rate, production of predicative and attributive adjectives, and production of adjectives with complex argument structure.Method and proceduresNarratives elicited from 14 agrammatic and 14 control participants were coded for open class grammatical category production (i.e., nouns, verbs, adjectives), with each adjective also coded for its syntactic environment (attributive/predicative) and argument structure.Outcomes and resultsOverall, agrammatic speakers used adjectives in proportions similar to that of cognitively healthy speakers. However, they exhibited a greater proportion of predicative adjectives and a lesser proportion of attributive adjectives, compared to controls. Additionally, agrammatic participants produced adjectives with less complex argument structure than controls.ConclusionsThe overall normal-like frequency of adjectives produced by agrammatic speakers suggests that agrammatism does not involve an inherent difficulty with adjectives as a word class or with predication, or that it entails a deficit in processing low imageability words. However, agrammatic individuals' reduced production of attributive adjectives and adjectives with complements extends previous findings of an adjunction deficit and of impairment in complex argument structure processing, respectively, to the adjectival domain. The results suggest that these deficits are not tied to a specific grammatical category.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Neurolinguistics - Volume 30, July 2014, Pages 48–68
نویسندگان
, ,