کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
912316 | 918207 | 2013 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

• Participants in both remote treatments (iCBT and bCBT) improved from pre-post treatment compared to the Control Group.
• There were no significant differences between the two remote treatments (iCBT and bCBT) in terms of efficacy or acceptability.
• When contact is reduced to once per week large effect sizes can still be obtained.
• Participants find the reduced contact equally as acceptable as twice weekly contact.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a common anxiety disorder. Although effective treatments exist many patients experience difficulties accessing treatment. Treatments that are delivered remotely, such as bibliotherapy-administered CBT (bCBT) and internet-administered CBT (iCBT) have the potential to improve access to treatment. This study was a three group randomized controlled trial that aimed to examine the benefits and acceptability of these two remote treatment options in the treatment of OCD, compared to a waitlist control group. Participants in the bCBT and iCBT groups read five lessons and received twice-weekly contact from a remote therapist. The control group did not receive any clinical contact during this time. The results indicated that participants in both remote treatment conditions (bCBT and iCBT) improved from pre-treatment to post-treatment and pre-treatment to 3-month follow-up on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. Once the bCBT and iCBT groups completed treatment, the control group was provided the iCBT protocol but with clinician contact only once per week. Results from the control group, after receiving iCBT treatment, indicated that large effect sizes can be obtained with weekly contact. These results provide preliminary support for the use of either bCBT or iCBT in the remote treatment of OCD.
Journal: Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders - Volume 2, Issue 4, October 2013, Pages 375–384