Is selective attention the basis for selective imitation in infants? An eye-tracking study of deferred imitation with 12-month-olds

• We simultaneously analyze 12-month-olds looking and deferred imitation behavior.
• We vary action functionality (arbitrary vs. functional) in a deferred imitation task.
• Infants’ looking time to arbitrary vs. functional does not significantly differ.
• No deferred imitation for arbitrary actions was found.
• Functional actions are, however, imitated significantly more than arbitrary actions.

Infants and children do not blindly copy every action they observe during imitation tasks. Research demonstrated that infants are efficient selective imitators. The impact of selective perceptual processes (selective attention) for selective deferred imitation, however, is still poorly described. The current study, therefore, analyzed 12-month-old infants’ looking behavior during demonstration of two types of target actions: arbitrary versus functional actions. A fully automated remote eye tracker was used to assess infants’ looking behavior during action demonstration. After a 30-min delay, infants’ deferred imitation performance was assessed. Next to replicating a memory effect, results demonstrate that infants do imitate significantly more functional actions than arbitrary actions (functionality effect). Eye-tracking data show that whereas infants do not fixate significantly longer on functional actions than on arbitrary actions, amount of fixations and amount of saccades differ between functional and arbitrary actions, indicating different encoding mechanisms. In addition, item-level findings differ from overall findings, indicating that perceptual and conceptual item features influence looking behavior. Looking behavior on both the overall and item levels, however, does not relate to deferred imitation performance. Taken together, the findings demonstrate that, on the one hand, selective imitation is not explainable merely by selective attention processes. On the other hand, notwithstanding this reasoning, attention processes on the item level are important for encoding processes during target action demonstration. Limitations and future studies are discussed.