کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
920872 1473868 2015 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Dual routes to cortical orienting responses: Novelty detection and uncertainty reduction
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مسیرهای دوگانه به پاسخ های هدایت قشر: تشخیص نوآوری و کاهش عدم اطمینان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی علوم اعصاب رفتاری
چکیده انگلیسی


• Reactive and proactive orienting responses converge on a common neural pathway.
• Frontal P3 activity can indicate task-relevant and task-irrelevant attentional orienting.
• Novelty P3 and Uncertainty P3 are negatively correlated.
• Novelty P3 and Uncertainty P3 can be dissociated based on brain-behavior correlations.
• Distractibility is characterized by large Novelty-P3 and small Uncertainty-P3 amplitudes.

Sokolov distinguished between reactive and proactive variants of the orienting response (OR). The Novelty P3 is considered as an electrophysiological signature of the reactive OR. Recent work suggests that the proactive OR is reflected in frontally distributed P3 activity elicited by uncertainty-reducing stimuli in task-switching paradigms. Here, we directly compare the electrophysiological signatures of reactive and proactive ORs. Participants completed a novelty oddball task and a task-switching procedure while the electroencephalogram was measured. Novel and uncertainty-reducing stimuli evoked prominent fronto-centrally distributed Novelty P3 and Uncertainty P3 waves, respectively. We found a substantial negative correlation between Novelty P3 and Uncertainty P3 across participants, suggesting that reactive and proactive ORs converge on a common neural pathway, but also that distinguishable routes to orienting exist. Moreover, response accuracy was associated with reduced Novelty-P3 and enhanced Uncertainty-P3 amplitudes. The relation between Novelty P3 and Uncertainty P3 might serve as an index of individual differences in distractibility and cognitive control.

Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Biological Psychology - Volume 105, February 2015, Pages 66–71
نویسندگان
, , , , ,