کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
931903 923046 2013 20 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Lexical differentiation in language production and comprehension
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی علوم اعصاب شناختی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Lexical differentiation in language production and comprehension
چکیده انگلیسی


• We examine lexical differentiation in language production and comprehension.
• Speakers differentiate new discourse referents from similar referents discussed in past contexts.
• We find no evidence of an expectation for differentiation from addressees.
• The breadth of relevant discourse context differs across language production and comprehension.

This paper presents the results of three experiments that explore the breadth of the relevant discourse context in language production and comprehension. Previous evidence from language production suggests the relevant context is quite broad, based on findings that speakers differentiate new discourse referents from similar referents discussed in past contexts (Van Der Wege, 2009). Experiment 1 replicated and extended this “lexical differentiation” effect by demonstrating that speakers used two different mechanisms, modification, and the use of subordinate level nouns, to differentiate current from past referents. In Experiments 2 and 3, we examined whether addressees expect speakers to differentiate. The results of these experiments did not support the hypothesis that listeners expect differentiation, for either lexically differentiated modified expressions (Experiment 2), nor for subordinate level nouns (Experiment 3). Taken together, the present findings suggest that the breadth of relevant discourse context differs across language production and comprehension. Speakers show more sensitivity to things they have said before, possibly due to better knowledge of the relevant context. In contrast, listeners have the task of inferring what the speaker believes is the relevant context; this inferential process may be more error-prone.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Memory and Language - Volume 69, Issue 3, October 2013, Pages 397–416
نویسندگان
, ,