کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی ترجمه فارسی نسخه تمام متن
93197 160116 2013 4 صفحه PDF سفارش دهید دانلود کنید
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Interventions to better manage the carbon stocks in Australian Melaleuca forests
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مداخلات برای مدیریت بهتر ذخایر کربن در جنگل های Melaleuca استرالیا
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک جنگلداری
چکیده انگلیسی


• We use published secondary data to derive an estimate of carbon stocks in Melaleuca forests.
• There is likely to be between 158 tC/ha and 286 tC/ha stored in Melaleuca forests.
• Protected Melaleuca forests are likely to stock between 328 M tC and 601 M tC.
• Suggesting an urgent need to better understand the nature of carbon stocks.
• An enact policy interventions to protect this globally important carbon store.

Forests and woodlands dominated by tree species of the genus Melaleuca cover around 7,556,000 ha in Australia and predominantly occur as wetland ecosystems. In this Viewpoint, we use published secondary data to estimate that there is likely to be between 158 tC/ha and 286 tC/ha stored in Melaleuca forests. These estimates are at least five times greater than the previous estimate made by the Australian Government (about 27.8 tC/ha). There are 2.1 million ha of protected Melaleuca forest which likely stock between 328 M tC and 601 M tC; equivalent to between 2.7% and 5.0% of total carbon storage of all Australian native forests. These estimates are significant because it appears that carbon stocks in Melaleuca forests are currently dramatically under-estimated in Australia's national greenhouse gas emissions inventory reported under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Whilst the precision of the estimates is limited by the availability of rigorous primary data, we also argue that the estimates are indicative and meaningful, and this synopsis highlights the fact that this forest type should be considered a significant carbon store nationally and globally.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Land Use Policy - Volume 35, November 2013, Pages 417–420
نویسندگان
, , , ,