|کد مقاله||کد نشریه||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||نسخه تمام متن|
|93222||160117||2013||10 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||دانلود کنید|
• New formal institutions are not necessarily the best sites for social learning.
• Interdependence and shared goals make social learning easier.
• Forms of innovation and modes of learning cannot be separated.
• Flexibility in role distribution is an enabling factor.
• The diversity of learning sites in a community enables it to adapt and survive.
Social learning took place largely outside the sphere of government and spurred substantial technological and institutional innovation. Unique patterns of networks, informal institutions and social learning environments delineate options for social learning that are more likely to succeed, to lead to implementation. The history of social learning on lake Mille Lacs showed that new formal institutions are not necessarily the best sites for social learning, and that forms of innovation and modes of learning cannot be separated. Interdependence and shared goals, and flexibility in role distribution appear as success factors. The diversity of learning sites in a community should not be understood as a problem, as an obstacle to central steering and education by government: it enables the community to adapt and survive.
Journal: Land Use Policy - Volume 34, September 2013, Pages 233–242