Linking usage and grammar: Generative phonology, exemplar theory, and variable rules

• Abstract phonology uses abstract operations to explain productivity and regularity.
• Usage-based phonology uses memory to explain quantitative detail, lexical diversity.
• Separately, abstract and usage based models each fail to account for some phenomena.
• Variable rule models meld abstract operations with probabilistic quantification.
• The VR approach is capable of modeling the widest range of observed phenomena.

Rule- and usage-based models in phonology are difficult to reconcile: ‘rule’-based approaches (including generative and optimality models) rely on abstraction and seek to account for regularity and generality. Usage-based models, like exemplar theory, rely on concrete representations, eschewing abstraction; they typically seek to account for lexically differentiated phonological phenomena, including variability, gradience and probabilistic properties. An alternative that incorporates both generative productivity and quantitative precision is the “variable rule” (VR) model of sociolinguistic variation. VR preserves advantages of rule-based models, including abstraction and the capacity to represent categorical processes. But VR resolves many limitations of these formalisms using probabilistic quantification: any phonological process or constraint may be associated with a probability, which permits the treatment of variation and gradience. This paper cites evidence from variation in speech style, child language, and reanalysis across the life span showing that speakers have both discrete abstract and nondiscrete, variable elements of phonology. Variable processes provide a nondeterministic but recoverable link between these different representations.